Motivation
Reviewer KgbX: "Could the authors clarify whether the method can be trained and evaluated on real-world video data, and discuss the potential challenges?"
Results
Zero-shot on 20 real handheld scenes, from one first frame and the scene's own camera path. The camera path is followed; pixel fidelity is not claimed.
Table 1: Zero-shot generation from real-capture first frames: camera following, and agreement with the real frames over the first 3 s.
| 20 scenes, first frame only | direction agreement | correlation | PSNR / LPIPS vs real, first 3 s |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memorizon 400 s | 0.93 | 0.79 | 11.7 / 0.58 |
| Memorizon 200 s | 0.90 | 0.73 | 11.8 / 0.58 |
| Repeat the first frame | – | – | 12.0 / 0.55 |
- Implied FOV is 111–118° against the 90° assumed; cause not identified.
Examples
Left: the real capture along the same camera path. Right: generated from the first frame only (400 s model).
Clip 1
Clip 2
Clip 3
Clip 4
Show the other 16 scenes
Clip 5
Clip 6
Clip 7
Clip 8
Clip 9
Clip 10
Clip 11
Clip 12
Clip 13
Clip 14
Clip 15
Clip 16
Clip 17
Clip 18
Clip 19
Clip 20
Setup
- 20 handheld scenes from DL3DV-10K; the model sees the first frame and the scene's own camera path.
- Translations rescaled to the training speed; intrinsics fixed at 90° horizontal FOV. Models trained on synthetic video only.
Conclusion
- The camera path is followed on real captures (direction agreement 0.93 / 0.90, correlation 0.79 / 0.73 for 400 s / 200 s), without any real-video training.
- Pixel fidelity is not claimed: PSNR / LPIPS against the real frames is no better than repeating the first frame.
- Real-video training is future work: estimated poses have ambiguous scale and noise, and our retrieval uses pose only.